Arkansas Act 264: Is Your School Ready for Multilingual Religious Posters?

Think your Arkansas school district fully understands Act 264? Think again.

In a bold move designed to test the limits of Arkansas Act 264, Chaz Stevens—the provocative founder of the Church of Satanology and veteran constitutional advocate—plans to donateover 20,000 religious posters to Arkansas public schools. But there’s a catch: they’re not all in English, and many have stylistically unconventional presentations.

What’s at Stake with Act 264?

Arkansas Act 264 mandates public schools to accept and display donated “Ten Commandments” and “In God We Trust” posters, provided they meet statutory guidelines. But what happens when these posters are in Arabic, Klingon, Hebrew, or even a Satanic-themed font? Stevens aims to find out.

In his recent letter to Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin, Stevens requested formal clarification on whether school districts can legally reject these compliant posters based solely on their language or stylistic choices. His letter underscores potential constitutional conflicts, specifically around viewpoint discrimination.

“Every school district must now decide whether it genuinely supports viewpoint neutrality or just prefers one version of religious expression,” Stevens stated in his request. “Rejecting these compliant posters could violate constitutional protections against viewpoint discrimination.”

A Test of True Neutrality

Stevens’ initiative isn’t just a media stunt; it’s a meticulously planned legal and constitutional challenge. He highlights past successes, notably the “Bible Ban” in Florida, where his strategic activism led Governor Ron DeSantis to reverse a controversial policy that allowed unlimited book challenges—proving the power of equal application of laws.

“If your law can’t handle diverse expressions, maybe it’s not really about religious freedom,” Stevens notes, echoing his provocative yet impactful methods from previous battles.

Why Arkansas Schools Should Pay Attention

Ignoring or rejecting these multilingual posters isn’t just unconstitutional—it could be costly. Stevens, whose campaigns have drawn national attention from MSNBC, NPR, and CNN, emphasizes the financial and educational risks of litigation for Arkansas districts.

“Schools should be spending funds on student programs, not defending unconstitutional biases,” Stevens emphasizes. “My goal remains cooperative clarity—but ambiguity will inevitably lead to costly lawsuits.”

Prepare Your District for Compliance

Arkansas school administrators should proactively:

• Review Act 264 thoroughly to understand obligations fully.
• Consult constitutional experts to avoid unintentional viewpoint discrimination.
• Prepare transparent policies for accepting diverse linguistic and stylistic poster donations.

Ready to Fight the System?

Inspired by Stevens’ strategic methods and want to effect real change? Join his exclusive REVOLT Boot Camp—where you’ll learn how to exploit bureaucratic loopholes, leverage media coverage, and force policy changes just like Act 264.

Conclusion

The challenge to Arkansas Act 264 is more than a test of religious poster laws—it’s a crucial fight for viewpoint neutrality and constitutional integrity. Is your district ready?

Don’t wait for controversy; be prepared. Connect with Revolt Training today and ensure your district stands on the right side of constitutional history.

Request for Formal Opinion on Application of Act 264