Five Questions for the City Commission (Aka: If This Is About Safety, Show Us the Numbers)
Available For Work
I’m looking for paid, remote-friendly work in IT, systems, automation, and analysis.
SEO, GEO, and AI ... up to speed on that.
I’m a former NASA, Microsoft, and IBM vendor who now finds himself between engagements. This isn’t a pivot away from REVOLT—it’s an honest statement of capacity.
My background is technical. I don’t do vibes. I do systems.
I specialize in diagnosing why things don’t work, then fixing, simplifying, or rebuilding them so they stop breaking. If your operation runs on tribal knowledge or duct tape, I’m useful.
Contract, project-based, or short-term work is fine.
Unpaid, equity-only, or vague ideas aren’t.
If you need competence and results, reach out.
TL;DR: The “Show Me the Numbers” Challenge
Chaz Stevens is calling out the City Commission for choosing “delay” over “data.” He argues that if BSO were truly the safer option, the Sheriff wouldn’t be begging for time—he’d be providing a spreadsheet. The post demands answers on:
- Actual Per-Capita Costs (BSO vs. Independent).
- Bureaucratic Overhead (How much money leaves the city?).
- Asset Ownership (Who keeps the gear?).
- Mutual Aid (Why can’t we do what Boca does?).
- Specific Rebuttals (If the study is wrong, name the page number).
If we’re being told that public safety demands delay, more studies, and another two years of the same contract, then fine. Let’s put the “Safety First” argument on the witness stand.
1. The Per-Capita Cost
What is the actual per-resident cost of a standalone Deerfield Beach department versus the BSO contract—including administrative overhead, pass-through fees, and county markup? No slogans. No “operational realities.” We need a side-by-side number.
2. The Overhead Question
What portion of our bill pays for local boots on the ground, and what portion pays for centralized BSO bureaucracy? How much of Deerfield’s money leaves the city limits?
3. Asset Ownership
If we transition, who owns the stations, vehicles, and equipment? If the answer is “it’s complicated,” spell it out now. Vague asset entanglement is the oldest trick in the municipal slow-walk playbook.
4. The Mutual Aid Reality Check
How would a standalone department integrate with Pompano Beach and Boca Raton? Those cities operate independently and use mutual aid agreements successfully. Is Deerfield uniquely incapable, or is the “regional model” being oversold?
5. The Delay Question
If the feasibility study is flawed, what specific assumptions are wrong? Give us page numbers and data points. Asking for time without rebutting the math isn’t about safety—it’s about keeping the calendar on your side.
Lastly…
If staying with BSO were the obviously safer choice, no one would be begging for two more years to think about it. They’d be asking for a vote. Safety arguments that can’t survive a spreadsheet are just delay tactics wearing turnout gear.
FAQs
According to the 2026 feasibility study, an independent fire department alone could save the city approximately $5.8 million in the first year and between $382 million and $604 million over 20 years.
The BSO contract for FY2026 includes approximately $1.6 million in “Overhead Allocation” and $709,512 in “Transfers to General Fund,” totaling over $2.3 million in fees that could be redirected to local services.
This is a point of contention. While the City typically owns the physical buildings (stations), the transition plan must clarify “asset entanglement” regarding fleet vehicles and specialized BSO equipment.
Yes. Nearby cities like Pompano Beach and Boca Raton already operate independently using the Florida Mutual Aid Act. The argument that Deerfield is “uniquely incapable” of this model is a central point of the MAOS critique.
Sheriff Gregory Tony has offered a two-year extension and offered to pay for a new study, claiming the current study is an “advocacy memo.” Critics like Chaz Stevens view this as a delay tactic to avoid a vote on the current cost-saving data.
Sedition Isn't Free.
Go ahead, speak your mind.
Recent Musings
Your City Is Throwing Error Codes. I Just Read Them.

A Quiet Warning to Cities: Invocation Policies Under Adversarial Review

Introducing GovHacks: We Don’t Write the Law. We Debug It.

Five Questions for the City Commission (Aka: If This Is About Safety, Show Us the Numbers)

Exposing Hypocrisy
One Story At A Time.
Media Hits
Let me teach you how to get in the news.
Press Hits
We'll Make You A Master Of The Media.

I Asked for an ESA Letter After a 10-Minute Chat. He Said Yes.
By Chaz Stevens Founder, REVOLT Training System Failure Boot Camp™ Want a letter for four emotional…

Investigating ESA Letter Abuse in California
This content is shared for public education, journalistic investigation, and policy advocacy. It includes direct communications…

California’s ESA Letter Scam: 15 Minutes, $149, No Care
This piece is a work of investigative commentary. All opinions expressed are those of the author…

How One Man (and One Bible Ban) Made DeSantis Blink
How Chaz Stevens Weaponizes Communication to Burn Systems Down (and Make DeSantis Blink) Forget influencer fluff.…

Burn the Letter Mill Down: How One $99 ESA Letter Could Crater an Industry.
Ever buy a disability accommodation letter in under 2 minutes? I did. That’s how this story…

I’m calling Austin’s bluff on the Ten Commandments | The Dallas Morning News
by Chaz Stevens Dallas Morning News Soon, Gov. Greg Abbott will sign Senate Bill 10 into…
