Avoid surprises before they harden into crises.
I help PR firms, lobbyists, and public-affairs teams identify where lawful external pressure will emerge, how it will scale, and which risks actually matter—before launch, headlines, or regulatory attention. This is upstream risk modeling, not crisis cleanup. If pressure is likely and surprise is unacceptable, the right time to talk is now.

TL;DR
The Miami Herald objectivity failure wasn’t about bad facts—it was about bad framing. By treating power as just another perspective, the paper missed the real story.
The Miami Herald didn’t get the facts wrong.
It did something worse.
It treated power like just another opinion.
Allow me to digress.
In its coverage of Deerfield Beach’s split from BSO, the Herald practiced a familiar ritual: quote both sides, step back, call it balance. That’s fine when two neighbors argue over a fence. It fails when one side controls armed services and the other is exercising a contract right.
The article faithfully reports that an independent study found the city could save “more than $500 million over the next 20 years.” That’s math. It then places that math next to a sheriff calling the study “an advocacy memorandum.”
Bullshit.
Those two things are not equal.
One is an audit. The other is a rebuttal from a threatened vendor.
And from a vendor who “fired missiles.”
Hello? Is anyone home?
Yet the paper presents them as parallel perspectives.
No wonder the Herald hired Brittany Wallman.
The Herald also quotes warnings about “emotional decisions,” risks to public safety, and the possibility of harm if the city walks away.
Fear is printed.
Fear is not evaluated.
Fear is allowed to sit there, untreated, as if it were data.
That’s the failure.
When Sheriff Gregory Tony Frank Drebin offers to extend the contract and pay for a new study, the article reports the offer but does not interrogate it. No question is asked about conflicts of interest. No context is given about procurement norms. Readers are left to assume this is just another reasonable proposal.
It isn’t.
Mayor Todd Drosky’s response — that the city bears full financial risk while controlling little under the BSO model — is accurate, boring, and devastating. It is also treated as just another quote, not the structural argument it actually is.
This is the Hunter S. Thompson problem in real time. “Objectivity” becomes a refusal to weigh evidence. Authority is laundered through quotation marks. Leverage is mistaken for perspective.
The result is journalism that feels neutral while quietly favoring power.
The BSO dispute isn’t the story.
The story is how easily fear, status, and institutional gravity still pass for balance — and how often “objective” reporting helps them do it.
Sedition Isn't Free.
Go ahead, speak your mind.
Recent Musings
Exposing Hypocrisy
One Story At A Time.
Media Hits
Let me teach you how to get in the news.
Press Hits
We'll Make You A Master Of The Media.

I Asked for an ESA Letter After a 10-Minute Chat. He Said Yes.
By Chaz Stevens Founder, REVOLT Training System Failure Boot Camp™ Want a letter for four emotional…

Investigating ESA Letter Abuse in California
This content is shared for public education, journalistic investigation, and policy advocacy. It includes direct communications…

California’s ESA Letter Scam: 15 Minutes, $149, No Care
This piece is a work of investigative commentary. All opinions expressed are those of the author…

How One Man (and One Bible Ban) Made DeSantis Blink
How Chaz Stevens Weaponizes Communication to Burn Systems Down (and Make DeSantis Blink) Forget influencer fluff.…

Burn the Letter Mill Down: How One $99 ESA Letter Could Crater an Industry.
Ever buy a disability accommodation letter in under 2 minutes? I did. That’s how this story…

I’m calling Austin’s bluff on the Ten Commandments | The Dallas Morning News
by Chaz Stevens Dallas Morning News Soon, Gov. Greg Abbott will sign Senate Bill 10 into…



