This is where the record is buried.
Accountability. Compliance. Transparency.
Founded as MAOS, 2008
TL;DR: REVOLT Training’s ACTS is a living archive of tactical textualism, documenting successful First Amendment challenges and public records litigation across Florida and the US. Founded in 2008, it provides the legal blueprints for forcing government transparency.
Systems fail methodically.
So do officials.
Power concedes nothing.
Pressure makes it.
There are those who heed the warning "don't mess with Texas," and then there are those who do the exact opposite.
Stevens is in the second group.
5 Star Average Rating
- Wynne Davis, NPR
The Art of Tactical Textualism.
My Acts of Sedition (once MAOS, now ACTS) is where this work began. It started as a watchdog project focused on local government corruption in South Florida.
The rules were followed exactly.
The results were made public.
Systems moved.
Elected officials went to jail.
Everything that came later traces back here.
About ACTS
ACTS is a public archive of real-world governance stress tests and failure analysis; it is intentionally confrontational. That’s the point.
Stress testing doesn’t work if everyone plays nice. Systems only reveal themselves under pressure. They bend. Or they break. There is no third option.
ACTS applies real-world pressure the way journalists, litigants, and hostile-but-lawful actors actually do. Not hypotheticals. Not workshops. Live fire.
What you’re reading is documentation. Failure modes. Escalation paths. Weak seams in laws, policies, and administrative instinct. This is not legal advice. Not advocacy. Not consulting.
It’s an archive of what happens when governance meets resistance, honed thru decades of in-the-wild experience.
Private, downstream work exists for organizations that want to understand these risks before they turn into lawsuits, headlines, or findings. That work is clinical. This page is not.
ACTS does not go gently. It load-tests.
Stop Guessing. Start Forcing Records Out.
You don’t win public-records fights by asking nicely.
You win by knowing exactly how agencies evade, delay, and sanitize—and how to box them in legally.
The FOI Playbook is the field manual I actually use: request structure, follow-ups, traps, timelines, and pressure tactics that force disclosures or build a clean record of noncompliance.
Get the FOI Playbook
Need the system to move?
Our services expose risk, apply lawful pressure, and force decisions before narratives harden and options disappear.
See How It Works
Recent Musings
ACTS, Unfiltered
Equal access. Malicious compliance. Constitutional pressure.
This is the archive of what happens when laws are forced to work as written.
ACTS isn’t a brand. It’s a record.
Each item below documents a tactic, a pressure point, or a system failure that couldn’t survive equal application.
You’re not buying merch.
You’re funding the work—and preserving the evidence.
Exposing Hypocrisy
One Story At A Time.
Media Hits
Let me teach you how to get in the news.
Press Hits
We'll Make You A Master Of The Media.
Being ACTS
Tactical Textualism is a civic activism methodology developed by Chaz Stevens that enforces government accountability by applying the literal text of laws—such as the First Amendment or Public Records Acts—to force institutions into binary choices: total compliance or the elimination of discriminatory policies.
REVOLT Training uses ‘malicious compliance’ to stress-test government systems. By insisting that administrative rules be applied exactly as written, the process exposes selective enforcement and forces agencies to either formalize their governance or abandon unconstitutional practices.
By following the literal text of Florida’s 2022 book-ban law to challenge the Bible in 63 school districts, Stevens forced a state-wide legislative revision. The action proved that selective enforcement of ‘neutral’ rules cannot withstand equal application of the law.
This project uses the First Amendment’s viewpoint neutrality requirement to challenge legislative prayer. By requesting to deliver a Satanic invocation, Stevens forces cities to either allow all viewpoints or replace religious prayer with a secular moment of silence.
A $1 claim acts as a ‘jurisdictional anchor’ in federal court. It prevents government defendants from mooting a constitutional case by changing behavior mid-litigation, ensuring a court must rule on the underlying legal violation.
No. Chaz Stevens operates through the Church of Satanology, a distinct entity used as a legal symbol to stress-test religious neutrality. He is not affiliated with The Satanic Temple.
Following Stevens’ 2008 investigations, the Mayor of Deerfield Beach and a City Commissioner were arrested on corruption charges. In 2011, another commissioner was convicted of falsifying business records.
The FOI Playbook is a method for request engineering that uses precise legal framing and documentation traps to make it legally impossible for agencies to ignore public records requests.
These challenges rely on the Public Forum Doctrine. If a government allows one religious display, it cannot legally discriminate against other viewpoints, including satirical or secular ones like a Festivus Pole.
Under recent precedents like Lindke v. Freed, a politician’s social media account becomes ‘state action’ if used for official duties. Blocking critics in this context may constitute unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination.